TU Delft’s team Silverwing reaches the finals of the GoFly Prize
By Heather Montague As one of five finalists in the Boeing sponsored GoFly Prize, TU Delft’s own team Silverwing aims to win with its S1 design, a personal flying motorcycle. Although it might seem like something out of a science fiction movie, human flight may soon become a reality. By founding the GoFly Prize, CEO Gwen Lighter set out to stimulate innovation in the development of personal flying devices. The three-phase global competition, announced in November 2017, aims to foster the development of safe, quiet, ultra-compact, near-VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) personal flying devices capable of flying twenty miles while carrying a single person. Making people fly TU Delft’s Silverwing came into being when two aerospace students put together a small team to submit a concept for the first phase of GoFly. When their idea was selected as one of the top ten out of hundreds of entries, Technical Manager Victor Sonneveld, a master’s student, and Team Manager James Murdza (BSc 2018) quickly pulled together a larger multi-disciplinary team. It has since grown to 34 students representing ten nationalities and nearly every faculty at TU Delft. In March, team Silverwing learned they had been chosen as one of the top five designs by GoFly. During this second phase of the competition, teams had to present a more detailed design and built various test set-ups, including a half-scale prototype. The S1, a tailsitter aircraft, rotates 90 degrees to take off and land on its tail, requiring no runway and less space than a car. “It’s basically a flying motorcycle, but what makes it special is that it takes off and lands vertically,” said Ruben Forkink, an aerospace graduate and Silverwing Chief of Partnerships & Business Development. “At the desired altitude you transition from vertical to horizontal flight and then you basically ride it like a motorcycle and transport yourself from A to B. Then you transition back from horizontal flight to land vertically on your tail.” Going beyond the call Although it was not a requirement of the competition, the S1 is battery powered, fully electric and able to fly autonomously. “We’re one of the few teams that opted to go completely electric,” said Nisarg Thakrar, an aerospace master’s student and member of the Silverwing structures team. “From our point of view, to be successful, it has to achieve the modern requirements, being electric and autonomous.” And although the limitations of battery technology make it challenging to carry the required amount of weight, making it autonomous means that the S1 could be used to transport packages, not just people. Students bring a lot to the table As competitions go, the GoFly Prize is unique in that it is open to anybody from anywhere in the world. “What’s really great and what makes us stand out is that we are the only undergrad team in the finals,” said Forkink. The other finalist teams include PhDs, researchers and companies with industry experience. “We have a lot of bachelor’s students on our team so it’s a challenge, but that’s what we really like,” noted Forkink. “We are able to combine the knowledge from all of these faculties and that makes us a real multidisciplinary team.” Putting hands-on education to work The aerospace faculty has played an integral role in Silverwing’s design and development process. According to Forkink, the team has members from all of the different tracks at aerospace, and knowledge gained in the classroom has been useful. “We have students that go to their lecture and 30 minutes later they come here and start working on what they just learned.” And Thakrar believes the master’s programme structures track has been a huge asset in the design of the S1. “We do most of our own work, but we do have limitations and at that point we can consult with professors as well as external parties that help us,” he said. “In my opinion, one of the best ways to be a good engineer is through application, not only through books and this project has been a great way to support that idea.” The final stage Team Silverwing is currently finalising the S1 design to prepare for manufacturing and they hope to have a test flight by the end of this year. In early 2020, they will participate in a final fly-off in the United States. During this last stage of the competition, the aircraft must take off vertically, cover an eleven-kilometre course and then land again vertically. Points will be awarded for low noise levels, size (the smaller the better) and speed. The winning team will receive a US$ 1 million grand prize. "GoFly is excited to see Team Silverwing-- a young team made up of many undergraduates-- competing with established companies and veterans of the industry, and holding their own,” said Lighter. “Team Silverwing brings novel innovation and out-of-the-box thinking to their personal flyer. We look forward to seeing Team Silverwing at the GoFly Final Fly Off next year, and we can’t wait to see them change the world." On April 30, 2019 Silverwing will unveil their award-winning design for the S1 to the general public. Want to see it? Click here .
Can ancient algae help replace chromium-6 in coatings?
Timelapse: corrosion protection of the letters ‘TUDelft’ What seemed like a wild idea in 2014, using the external skeletons of algae to prevent corrosion, has now been shown to provide long term protection of aluminium used in airplanes. In a few years’ time, it may provide a safe and environmentally-friendly replacement for the use of chromium-6. “Because of its toxicity, the European Commission has forbidden the use of chromium-6,” says Paul Denissen, PhD researcher in the Novel Aerospace Materials group at the faculty of Aerospace Engineering. “Use of chromium-6 is only still tolerated in situations where good alternatives are lacking, for example to protect airplanes against corrosion.” He explains that the aluminium alloy most used in aviation is especially susceptible to corrosion because of the copper that has been added to increase material strength. Typically, multiple boundary layers are applied to protect this aluminium against weathering. One of these layers is a primer coating loaded with chromium-6. “Our research focusses on using the external skeletons of a sort of algae to develop an environmentally friendly alternative for the use of chromium-6 in this layer.” Challenging chromium-6 Chromium-6 is a so-called active corrosion-inhibitor. When a treated surface is damaged, for example by scratching, the chromium-6 atoms will be released from the primer layer. They will create a thin layer of chromium oxide on the exposed metal surface, preventing further corrosion. After their release, chromium-6 atoms can continually redistribute themselves, providing continuous protection of the damaged area. “There are a number of alternative corrosion-inhibitors that are also very good at creating a protective barrier,” Denissen explains. “Unlike chromium-6, however, they can oxidize only once, and the protective layer they create is not permanent. Long-term protection therefore requires the continuous release of these inhibitors. More importantly, these alternative inhibitors may already chemically react with the primer coating at the time of its fabrication or application, thereby weakening their anti-corrosive power.” Quite some challenges to overcome, with a possible solution coming from the world of algae. Various shapes of the external skeleton of diatom algae Source : https://paleonerdish.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/diatoms.jpg Pill-box protection Diatoms are a group of microalgae that have been roaming the earth for more than 100 million years. These single cell organisms come in various sizes, ranging from one to a few tens of micrometres. They have a hard, inorganic shell to protect them from the environment. This cell wall is made out of silica, the same material as glass, and contains many nanometre-sized pores. Inspired by the pill-box shape of these shells ( see figure ), it was Santiago Garcia, associate professor in the same group and the supervisor of Denissen, who came up with the idea to use them for active corrosion protection in coatings. Garcia explains that “my idea was to fill these shells with alternative corrosion-inhibitors, and then add these loaded shells to the primer coating. I envisioned the pill-box structure to prevent the unwanted chemical reaction between inhibitors and coating.” He also imagined the pores to allow the immediate and sustained release of these inhibitors when the protective layers are damaged, and the metal surface is exposed. “And these algae shells are easily available at low-cost,” Denissen adds. Rapid development Denissen explains that his 2015 master’s thesis was merely a feasibility study, to see if this approach could be successful. “Now, we are three years into my PhD and despite limited resources we have just shown corrosion protection potentially equalling that of chromium-6. We still use our first pick of algae shells, but we have substantially increased their filling with inhibitors as well as their release efficiency, leading to a much-improved protection.” 30-day protection by algae coating with corrosion-inhibitors Testing in Paris After intensive work in Delft to proof the concept, the researchers travelled to Paris for a challenging experiment. “We were curious as to the long-term protective power of our coating for large damages, as required by several companies,” Denissen says. Together with their collaborators from the group of Polina Volovich at Chimie ParisTech, they applied a 1 mm wide scratch to samples of aluminium used for airplanes, covered in a variety of their test ‘algae-coatings’. These samples were subsequently immersed in large volumes of a highly corrosive environment. The researchers got what they bargained for ( see figure ). “We were astounded,” continues Denissen, “what we saw was full protection against corrosion, even after thirty days of immersion. Only a couple of alternative solutions come this close to the results obtained with chromium-6. It’s an amazing result after only such a short period of development.” Visualising corrosion protection Denissen and Garcia have also developed a novel method to study the onset and development of corrosion. It allowed them to gain a detailed understanding of the results they obtain with their algae shells, guiding further optimisation. “It is relatively simple technology, using a basic optical camera,” Garcia explains. “Optical techniques have traditionally been used to obtain qualitative information or to make beautiful pictures. What we have shown is that optics can be used to monitor and quantify local corrosion processes at a very high resolution, in real time. It is mature technology, allowing us to analyse any coating, commercially available or still in development.” Optimal protection “We use our experimental findings to build a computer model for further optimization of our coatings,” Denissen says. This can prove very beneficial as these algae shells come in more than 100.000 sizes and shapes. And there are more variables to tune, such as the type of corrosion-inhibitor used, whether or not to add an outside layer to the algae shell to even better regulate inhibitor release, or the optimal concentration of shells in the coating. “We may for example want to use disc-shaped shells to reduce our protective layer to the thickness currently used by the industry,” Denissen explains. “We are also looking into using combinations of inhibitors and shells in our coatings, further improving corrosion protection.” A small revolution It is not an easy task to replace chromium-6. “There are many barriers, resulting in a lack of good alternatives,” Denissen says. “For example, the Dutch Ministry of Defence wants proof that alternatives will provide twenty-year protection of their military equipment. But there are no good methods to accelerate this evaluation, to validate it in only a limited time-span.” More importantly, he explains, many of the tests used to validate the efficiency of new coating materials are designed specifically for chromium-6. “It is not a level playing field. It means that you have to prove your alternative coating to behave similar to chromium-6, rather than prove that it provides adequate protection.” Nevertheless, a small revolution has recently taken place. Rather than waiting for coating manufacturers to replace chromium-6, airplane manufacturers are now actively developing their own solutions as well. “At the moment, we are already talking to both.” Future perspective Despite very promising results, Denissen stresses that “we need a few more years to develop and demonstrate our algae-based coating before it can be used on planes, bridges or any metal surface that needs protection against corrosion. Does our coating protect sufficiently against scraping and scratching? Can it withstand frequent variations in outside temperature? Will it bond well with the other protective layers?” Garcia adds that “our main commitment is to find solutions to societal problems. We are currently talking to several industry partners about collaboration. Together we can speed up the development and launch of our technology and we expect to be ready for operational experiments by 2022, on an airplane.” Until completion of those experiments and passing the required certifications, the airplane industry may require the European Commission to again extend its leniency, tolerating the use of chromium-6 for the time being. You can find more information about real-time corrosion measurements here (in Dutch). You can find scientific publications, related to this research, here in Corrosion Science and in Electrochimica Acta .
Teacher of the Year 2018: Calvin Rans
I encourage my students to dig deeper into topics themselves He likes to give his students a glimpse of understanding so that they will dig deeper into the topic themselves. Calvin Rans, Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Structures and Materials Department, enjoys the art of engaging people in very complex ideas and concepts. And so successfully that he was elected both Teacher of the Year 2017-2018 at the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology and Best Lecturer of TU Delft 2018. ‘Students won’t learn from what you say in the classroom. Just like kids, they have to make the mistakes themselves. This means that you have to find a way to help them navigate through their own learning process.’ On behalf of the LR Faculty, Calvin received a little art deco style metallic aircraft ‘flying’ over half the globe. ‘Ironically, I have an exact duplicate of the statuette at home. My wife bought it a few months ago, completely by chance!’ The prize from the entire university includes a certificate and a sum of money. The awards are a recognition for Calvin’s excellent work at TU Delft. ‘I like my students to apply the knowledge they’ve acquired from courses in some way that’s useful and focus on that rather than on their grades. Of course, students have to pass exams. But I stimulate them to be more satisfied with the understanding they gain than with a grade.’ p>Calvin Rans studied Aerospace Engineering at Carleton University, and then held a post-doc position at TU Delft. His research background and all of his professional activities have been involved the fatigue and damage tolerance of aircraft structures, in particular: damage-tolerant design and additive layer manufacturing (3D printing). At the bachelor’s level, Calvin teaches ‘Mechanics of Materials’ (1st year) and ‘Structural Analysis and Design’ (2nd year); at the master’s level, he teaches two courses: Joining Methods and Forensic Engineering. Online, he teaches ‘Air Safety’ and is involved in the ‘MOOC Introduction to Aerospace Structures and Materials’. Online teaching Calvin is a big proponent of online teaching. ‘Using online content helps automate many aspects of teaching. It also opens up more time and opportunity for interaction and engagement with students. Online education does not replace on-campus teaching. It basically creates new avenues to disseminate knowledge to different groups of people.’ The ‘Mechanics of Materials’ lecture course for which Calvin was nominated provided a completely blended teaching experience. ‘All of the lecturing was done with online videos that I had made, opening up more class time to discuss the connection of the theory to aerospace applications. The first-year students really appreciated getting this extra context behind what they were learning.’ Second-year students complimented Calvin on his redesign of the ‘Structural Analysis and Design’ course: a heavily mathematical course with a huge failure rate. ‘I completely changed the focus to understanding the underlying concepts hidden underneath the complex math. One of the changes we made was to create an exam not based on individual questions but questions that followed a design process. All the questions were related to a specific application, providing a unifying context for the exam. However, each question was formulated in such a way that the numerical answers did not depend on one another, minimizing the risk of continuation errors. This allowed the students to reflect on their answers and to make connections with their previous learning activities to see how concepts are actually related to applications.’ Magic trick Calvin’s ‘magic trick’? ‘I always try to show the connection between theory and practice. I use my own research projects, case studies or even certain projects being addressed in other courses. Sometimes I bring in some very interesting, complex organic shapes that have been 3D-printed to give an idea of the direction in which we are going. We then break it down so that the students can get a better idea of the structural elements they have been studying. It gives them something to connect with.’ Being an entertainer is also crucial. ‘It helps to get people in a relaxed state of mind so that they can reflect and think about things. That’s why I bring cartoons into my class. And when I do a presentation of bending deflection, I bring in hockey sticks and we do an analysis of a hockey player doing a slapshot. These little things make it fun and encourage students to interact.’ Calvin has always been interested in figuring things out. ‘And I found that the easiest way to really figure something out is to be able to explain it to someone else. So, for me, teaching became a way for me to learn.’ For education in the future, he foresees classroom environments full of challenges and problems to be solved in which students have access to small online modules or lectures for what they need to learn. ‘Of course, this will require a different type of teacher: a mentor who guides students toward what they need to learn. Some universities are already playing with this idea.’ The TU Delft DreamTeams composed of students who work on a project for a year are a fantastic example of this approach. ‘In this case, the university gives these students access to the information they need for their project, but they are not learning just to pass an exam; they are trying to make their project work. This tends to be the most useful education experience for them. I hope universities will be heading in this direction in the future.’ Teaching became a way for me to learn.