COMET (4TU.CEE project)

About the Comet project series

Comprehensive Ethics Teaching for Engineering and Design students (COMET) is a series of research projects funded by the 4TU.Centre for Engineering Education and taking place at the Ethics and Philosophy of Technology Section (TPM). The aim of the research series is to strenghten the ethics teaching at TU Delft in terms of educational methods, by relying on a solid theoretical foundation.

COMET - Comprehensive Ethics Teaching for Engineering and Design students

Comet 3.0 (2023 2025)

Team members: Aafke Fraaije, Andrea Gammon, Steffen Steinert, Martin Sand, Lavinia Marin, Janna van Grunsven

Project introduction and background information

Our goal for this two-year project is to turn the theoretical insights from COMET 1.0 into several concrete experiential exercises, in a manner similar to the exercise developed in COMET 2.0. In doing so, we will work towards an EEE Ecosystem. We think that a systematic and comprehensive approach to how the teaching of ethics at TU Delft can maximize its impact is urgently needed. Combining fundamental and qualitative research, we will further develop what we call an Experiential Engineering Ethics Framework. We started developing this theoretical framework in Comet 2.0, with the paper on moral imagination. Now, we need to develop this framework in a way that allows us to design specific teaching methods for the other major learning goals in EEE, by using insights from the latest research in 4E cognition and educational sciences.Objective and expected outcomes

The overall question our research aims to answer is: how do we develop experiential exercises that are genuinely effective, capable of making ethics come alive as a pervasive feature of the world of engineering? More specific questions include:

1)     How do we design experiential engineering ethics exercises that avoid being shallow and overly simplistic (a common criticism of many ‘case-based exercises’ and so-called micro-ethical approaches)?

2)     How do we achieve this in a manner that incorporates the relevant ethical tools and concepts future engineers must be familiar with (e.g. responsibility; fairness; inclusivity; empathy, etc.)?

3)     How to integrate the new methods and learning goals with the existing demands of the various engineering disciplines at TUD? In particular, how can we provide the necessary support to engineering teachers that want to include ethics in their curricula?

Answering these questions, we believe, will greatly contribute to TU Delft’s aim to educate engineers who are responsible and who see socio-ethical issues as deeply intertwined with the work of future engineers.

The proposed project builds off the main applicant’s background as an engineer and a philosopher of education, and on the second applicant’s research on embodied situated ethics. All the members of the project have a vast experience in teaching ethics to engineering students as well as solid theoretical background in ethics and philosophy.

Project objectives:

1) Practical - educational: We will design and test several exercises and teaching methods within engineering ethics education inspired by our novel theoretical framework. The aim is to deliver several exercises to be used in teaching that implement this framework (at least 4 exercises). We will continue the work started in the previous two projects Comet 1.0 and Comet 2.0, and we will focus on teaching exercises and methods based on those insights (on moral sensitivity, moral imagination, empathy and anticipation) using the experiential ethics framework; we will also explore the potential of arts-based methods (WP3).

2) Institutional ecosystem development. We aim to design ways of integrating our theoretical and practical teaching experience into the actual teaching at TU Delft. We want to embed these exercises and methods by providing teachers from other disciplines with a contact point for ethics (teaching the teachers) and by evaluating what the ethics teaching needs are for several disciplines and assessing how we can help with that (WP5). These steps are meant to render ethics teaching responsive to present needs and in line with future developments, by aligning our theoretical insights with the needs of the teachers and students in various disciplines. We will start with one program as a way of piloting how to embed experiential ethics systematically. We envision our work as contributing towards an ecosystem of learning and teaching ethics, for which the embedding practices will be the first step in a series of developments.

Media resources:


Project series outcomes

Finished iterations of the previous projects in the Comet series

Comet 1.0 (2019 - 2021)

Researchers: Janna van Grunsven, Taylor Stone, Lavinia Marin
Supervisory board: Sabine Roeser, Neelke Doorn

The project was both retrospective and prospective: looking back at the successes and challenges from the last 20 years of integrating ethics into the curriculum at TU Delft, and identifying and proposing best practices for ethics education going forward. It developed new conceptualisations of moral sensitivity and ethical anticipation in engineering ethics education. It also created several pedagogical operationalisations of those concepts through exercises and teaching techniques.

 

Comet 2.0 (2021 - 2022)

Researchers: Janna van Grunsven, Lavinia Marin, Trijsje Franssen, Andrea Gammon

Project objectives. Developing an experiential ethics education theoretical framework and associated teaching methods and exercises.

The overall question our research aims to answer is: how do we develop experiential exercises that are genuinely effective, capable of making ethics come alive as a pervasive feature of the world of engineering? More specific questions include:

  • 1)    How do we do this in a manner that incorporates the relevant ethical tools and concepts future engineers must be familiar with (e.g. responsibility; fairness; inclusivity; empathy, etc.)?
  • 2)    How do we design experiential engineering ethics exercises that avoid being shallow and overly simplistic (a common criticism of many ‘case-based exercises’)?
  • 3)    What experiential approaches already offered at TU Delft (challenge-based learning, role-play exercises, stakeholder debates, theatre workshops, speculative design, film-making, etc.) can we build off?
  • 4)    What new experiential exercises should be included?