Prof.dr. M.P. (Marjan) Hagenzieker

Profile

Marjan Hagenzieker is Professor at Delft University of Technology. She graduated in experimental psychology and received her Doctorate (PhD) at Leiden University. Her research and education activities focus on the road safety effects of the transport system, with particular interest in road user behaviour aspects. Research topics include distraction in traffic; safety of vulnerable road users (e.g. elderly, bicyclists); road user interactions with road infrastructure, in-vehicle technology, and automated vehicles. She also holds a part time position at the Norwegian Centre of Transport Research TØI.

Research interests

Traffic and Transportation Safety Lab
Behavioural research to improve traffic safety
TRAIL Research School
Delft Road Safety Course
Norwegian Centre of Transport Research TØI

Research

The behaviour of road users is a recurring theme in my research. How do road users, for example, deal with distractions, smart cars and complex traffic situations, and what is the impact of their behaviour on road safety?

PhD research supervised

S. Berge, HMIs for bicycles, TU Delft (ongoing).
M. Boele, Cycling and ageing. How can older cyclists safely participate in traffic? TU Delft (ongoing)
J. Vos, Driver expectations of freeway curve driving, TU Delft (ongoing).
T. Hoekstra, The role of diversity in road safety: How do road users interact with those more and less vulnerable than themselves, TU Delft (ongoing).
P. Núñez Velasco, Automated driving in cities: Traffic safety and urban design, TU Delft (ongoing).
N. Kovácsová, Cyclists’ hazard anticipation and performance. TU Delft; (ongoing).
A. Stelling-Kończakn, Attention and distraction of bicyclists in traffic: the role of auditory information, TU Delft; 2018.
A. Knapper, The effects of using mobile phones and navigation systems during driving, TU Delft; 2018.
P. Schepers, A safer road environment for cyclists, TU Delft; 2013.
S. Houwing, Estimating the risk of driving under the influence of psychoactive substances, University of Groningen; 2013.
Ch. Bax, Processes and patterns; The utilisation of knowledge in Dutch road safety policy, Radboud University Nijmegen; 2011.
S. de Craen, The X-factor: A longitudinal study of calibration in young novice drivers, TU Delft; 2010.
M. Houtenbos, Expecting the unexpected. A study of interactive driving behaviour at intersections, TU Delft; 2008.
R. Davidse, Assisting the older driver; Intersection design and in-car devices to improve the safety of the older driver, University of Groningen; 2007.
J. Mesken, Determinants and consequences of drivers' emotions, University of Groningen; 2006.

Educational activities

MSc course Traffic Safety CIE5810
MSc course Intelligent Vehicles (road safety impact) CIE5805
TRAIL International PhD Summer School 2019 - Cycling in Cities - 9 / 13 September 2019

Hagenzieker, M., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., van Schagen, I., de Bruin, J., van Gent, P., & Commandeur, J. (2019). Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: results of a photo experiment. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security.
Kovácsová, N., de Winter, J., & Hagenzieker, M. (2019). What will the car driver do? A video-based questionnaire study on cyclists’ anticipation during safety-critical situations. Journal of Safety Research, 69, 11–21.
Heikoop, D., Hagenzieker, M., Mecacci, G., Calvert, S., Santoni De Sio, F., & van Arem, B. (2019). Human behaviour with automated driving systems: A quantitative framework for meaningful human control. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.
Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J. C. F., Stanton, N., Bellet, T., van Arem, B., Brookhuis, K., Martens, M.H., Bengler, K., Andersson, J., Merat, N., Reed, N., Flament., M., Hagenzieker, M., & Happee, R. (2019). A Human Factors Perspective on Automated Driving Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(3), 223–249.
Stelling-Konczak, A., Vlakveld, W., Van Gent, P., Commandeur, J. J. F., Van Wee, B., & Hagenzieker, M. P. (2018). Glance behaviour of teenage cyclists listening to music, ethicial considerations and a case study in real traffic. Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 47-57.
Rodriguez Palmeiro, A., Van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., Farah, H., de Winter, J., & Hagenzieker, M. (2018). Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 1005-1020.
Janssen, B., Schepers, P., Farah, H., & Hagenzieker, M. (2018). Behaviour of cyclists and pedestrians near right angled, sloped and levelled kerb types: do risks associated to height difference of kerbs weigh up against other factors? European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research EJTIR, 18(4), 360-371.
Hoekstra, T., Twisk, D., & Hagenzieker, M. (2018). Self-described road user role as a social identity: stereotypes and attributions by self-described cyclists and car drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 365–377.

More publications

Interaction between vulnerable road users and automated vehicles: impact on traffic safety and urban design (NWO-STAD project)

Supporting the Interaction of Humans and Automated Vehicles SHAPE-IT
More information

NWO-STAD project
More information

Meaningful Human Control over Automated Driving Systems (MHC-ADS)
More information

Road safety of bicycles, e-bikes, and other motorized two-wheelers (MOTORIST project).
More information

Human factors and automated driving (HF-auto project)
More information

Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs and medicines (European project DRUID)
More information

Hagenzieker, M.P., 2015. "Dat paaltje had ook een kind kunnen zijn". Over verkeersveiligheid en gedrag van mensen in het verkeer / "that bollard could have been a child". About road safety and behaviour of people in traffic. Inaugural speech. Delft University of Technology, Delft.
Hagenzieker, M.P. (1999). Rewards and road user behaviour. An investigation of the effects of reward programs on safety belt use. PhD thesis Leiden University.

VVN, 15 november 2019, Emoties kun je niet bedwingen, het gaat erom hoe we hiermee omgaan
Trouw, 5 oktober 2019, Stikstofprobleem of niet, 100 km per uur is beter.
NOS journaal, 7 maart 2019, Fietssnelwegen comfortabel maar automobilisten hebben hardnekkige gewoonte.
Volkskrant, 13 september 2018, Hoe groot is de invloed van smartphones op het aantal verkeersongelukken?
Nieuwsuur, Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS). Dit is de toekomst van zelfdenkende voertuigen. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 17 June 2018, 22:00 - 22:15.
Verkeerskunde (2018). Eerst mensen begrijpen, dan zelfrijdende auto's programmeren. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 21 February 2018.
Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS). Veel slimme en 'veilige' snufjes in nieuwe auto's nauwelijks gebruikt. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 1 November 2017, 19:30 - 20:00.
De auto show, BNR Nieuwsradio (2015). Tesla te vroeg met autopilot. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 13 November 2015, 15:00 - 15:30.
Verkeerskunde (2015). Beter begrip ongevalsrisico's voor veiliger verkeer. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 18 December 2015.
Trouw (2015). Auto-auto eist van chauffeur juist meer. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 26 October 2015.
Telegraaf (2015). Langer mobiel blijven maakt slachtoffers. Interview Marjan Hagenzieker: ziet nieuwe verkeersonveiligheid ontstaan. 9 November 2015.
BNR, Business News Radio (2014). Afleiding in de auto; Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 29 July 2014.
Radio 1 (2013). Werklunch: Verkeersveiligheid in Marokko. Interview with Marjan Hagenzieker. 13 December 2013, 13:15 - 13:25.